US Swing Districts: Prices and Ballots
How rising living costs shape voter sentiment in US swing districts ahead of November congressional elections, and why many voters still back incumbents.
Key points
- American consumers describe the rising cost of living as a top concern, one that has changed how they shop.
- Yet that anxiety will not necessarily reshape their votes in next week's congressional elections.
- Reuters interviewed more than two dozen voters in three East Coast swing districts during routine shopping trips, and most described high gas and grocery bills as top of mind.
- The voters largely identified as working- or middle-class.
American consumers describe the rising cost of living as a top concern, one that has changed how they shop.
Yet that anxiety will not necessarily reshape their votes in next week's congressional elections.
Reuters interviewed more than two dozen voters in three East Coast swing districts during routine shopping trips, and most described high gas and grocery bills as top of mind.
The voters largely identified as working- or middle-class.
Their accounts match Reuters/Ipsos polling that places living costs as the most pressing issue ahead of the November 3 elections, which will decide control of the US House of Representatives and Senate.
More than half of those interviewed leaned Democratic and said they planned to vote against Republican candidates, often with renewed urgency.
Of the ten who had previously backed incumbent congressional Republicans, eight said they would stick with them this year.
That loyalty persists even though inflation has been pushed up by tariffs introduced by President Donald Trump and by energy costs linked to the Iran war.
The tension between economic grievance and partisan attachment is the central puzzle of this cycle.
Rising Costs Meet Midterm Politics
John Beers, a self-employed 74-year-old in Peekskill, New York, decried a staggering rise in grocery prices and said he would be very disappointed if prices do not ease soon.
Still, he supports the Iran war and is sticking with his Republican representative, Mike Lawler, in a district where an Emerson College poll showed Lawler trailing Democratic challenger Cait Conley by two points.
Beers has traded down to cheaper coffee and dropped items such as avocado oil and sardines.
Fred McDonald, a 71-year-old retired diesel mechanic from Easton, Pennsylvania, has cut beef from his diet and winces at every gas fill-up.
He and his wife Antoinette, 69, live with their daughter after a landlord reclaimed their last apartment, and Antoinette is considering taking a job.
McDonald backs Republican Ryan Mackenzie, whom he calls honest, and blames inflation on generalized greed among political elites rather than on Republicans.
The couple's experience captures the pinch from beef and gas prices in a district where opinion polls give Democrat Bob Brooks a narrow edge over Mackenzie.
Voters Who Trade Down But Stay Loyal
Katie Thomas, who leads the Kearney Consumer Institute, argues that consumers have decoupled sentiment from behavior.
Anxiety about unknowns such as the Middle East conflict and the rise of artificial intelligence leaves people without a reliable picture of the future, so they fall back on routine, habit, and loyalty.
Economic sentiment, she suggests, is an increasingly unreliable indicator of how people shop and vote.
The data bear this out.
Consumer confidence has fallen to nearly a 12-and-a-half-year low, yet retail sales for the first nine months of this year are 4.7 percent higher than the same period last year, according to US Census figures.
Consumers are widely trading down on essentials while still splurging on luxuries they value.
That disconnect complicates Democratic hopes of flipping seats.
Control of the House hinges on a few dozen of the 435 seats being contested, and national Reuters/Ipsos polling shows Democrats leading Republicans on a generic ballot question, with a majority of voters faulting Trump's handling of the economy.
Why Sentiment No Longer Predicts Behavior
Several Democratic voters told Reuters they feel increased urgency this election, which could raise turnout.
Carla Schiller, a 67-year-old retired nurse in New Jersey's seventh district, is switching from Republican Tom Kean Jr. to Democrat Rebecca Bennett, citing the need to afford food.
She now shops at a lower-priced grocer to cut costs.
Donna Sook, a 76-year-old conservative Democrat in Pennsylvania, said she almost fainted seeing gas at 4.65 dollars.
Nationwide, US gas prices average 4.29 dollars a gallon, up 40 percent from a year ago, according to AAA.
Joanice Patino, 49, fretted about affording gas for her nursing commute on top of hundreds of dollars in monthly medical costs for her nonverbal autistic daughter, and plans to vote for Democratic challenger Conley.
The race in New York's seventeenth district, where Patino lives, is one of the tight contests that will decide House control.
Whether cost-of-living grievances translate into changed ballots remains uncertain, but the evidence suggests habit and loyalty blunt their electoral force.